With all it's imperfections

That phrase is the unmistakable signature of someone who is inching towards anti-semitism.  What other group of people is held to such high standards?  None, that's for sure.  What are these supposed imperfections that infect the Jewish state; how could the Jews of the middle east cure their affliction?  They can't because they aren't sick.

Moreover, the Jewish state is hailed as "the only democracy in the middle east that's tolerant of gays and women".  What a low bar to meet.  The truth is that the too tolerant Jews are more tolerant than the rest of the world.  From the perspective of the Left, they surpass every other country on the face of the earth.  The entire qualification that they are the only mideast democracy, or that they're good "with all their imperfections", wink, wink is nothing more than the slander that they are evil but not that evil.

Anyone who uses this phrase has already in their heart and mind conceded the premise that the Jews of the middle east don't belong there and are less than they should be.

How many stupid fucking Jews are there?

The reason this country is going into the toilet is that conservatives are no longer actually conservative. Take this Ann Coulter incident. Clifford D. May is an idiot and he wrote a letter to Ms. Coulter proving it. Let's get a few things straight, it should be clear from the context of her statement what she meant. The "fucking" in the statement was an exclamation. Regardless, who the fuck cares whether Ann Coulter likes Jews or not. If you are a smart Jew, you care whether the policies she espouses are beneficial or detrimental to you.

Moving beyond my rambling to Mr. May's, his letter is an exercise in incoherence. The innuendo is that her language means she's an anti-semite, and he then proceeds to say it's really really bad to be an anti-semite, and that the good republican candidates were just reaffirming this nations constant support for Israel. No, they weren't. They were in fact pandering (my suspicion is not to jews, but to christians).

One particularly stupid point in his article is the suggestion that Ann wouldn't say, those fucking blacks or those fucking hispanics. He's right, she wouldn't because that would raise a ridiculous shit storm because of the crazy PC bullshit that's going on in this country. You know what she would say, how many fucking white males are there or how many fucking christians. She'd say it because those groups of people don't go apeshit for any reason whatsoever. I dare Mr. May to say a bad word about "those people"....fuck, I forgot that's verboten language with regards to those fucking people.

I suspect that Ann thought that Jews in this country and conservatives (or so they claim) are not "those" people who go completely apeshit over non-offenses like these. The so-called conservatives are ruining this country and whatever is left of the Republican party. It's really astonishing to watch CONSERVATIVES go bananas over stuff like this.

Here's a link to the idiot: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0915/may092415.php3

Qualified...compared to what?

I think what the political pundits don't get is that pretty much no one in public office is qualified to be in public office.  Seriously, our politicians don't do anything, at least not positive.  Trump and Carson are not qualified, please!  Compared to who...Obama?  What exactly did Obama DO before becoming president?  Is being a politician a qualification?  Well, yeah, if your job is to be a politician.

The truth is that we'd be better off with decent folks in charge who have a high enough intellect (not too high) to do the job.  There's no special presidential qualification.  For god's sake, the democrats are destroying this country and these are the qualified ones!  Heaven forbid we get a few "unqualified" people in charge.

What makes everybody angry is that the charge of Carson and Trump being unqualified is because they are not elite douche bags like themselves.  It was the same with Harriet Miers.  To all you elite SOBs out there, take your John Roberts and your Obamacare and put it where the sun don't shine.

Why are you asking?

Ben Carson recently got into trouble when he answered a question regarding whether a Muslim should be president.  Here is the text:

On Sunday's Meet the Press, Chuck Todd asked Ben Carson, "Should a President’s faith matter?"

Carson's answer was comfortingly banal. "Well, I guess it depends on what that faith is," he replied. "If it’s inconsistent with the values and principles of America, then of course it should matter. But if it fits within the realm of America and consistent with the Constitution, no problem."

But Todd had a follow-up. "So do you believe that Islam is consistent with the Constitution?"

And then Carson went off the rails. "No, I don’t, I do not," he said. "I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation. I absolutely would not agree with that."

OFF THE RAILS!!!  Really?.  Nevertheless, what is the point of this question?  To put Ben Carson in a situation where they can label him a racist.  Literally, the entire point of the question is to call him a racist.  Does it matter whether Carson believes that Islam is consistent with the constitution?  Nope.  Does it matter whether Carson believes that Christianity is consistent with the constitution?  Nope.  His first response was perfect.  His second response should have been something like:

That's not a question for me to answer.  It's a question for an candidate who is a believer in Islam to answer and I fully expect that you will ask that candidate whether his/her faith would override his faithfulness to the constitution.  My faith has made me into the person I am today, a person who will govern with adherence to our constitution unlike the current president and the democratic party.